> What we're really missing is a bunch of "hardware x, config y, testing > z, results a, b, c." TMF used to have some stuff up for older hardware > but there's just nothing recent to use as a measuring stick.. > Right. Well. I've left this far too long. But there is now a wiki page for initial benchmarking info. Until TMF have the standardized testing ready for public use its only going to contain very rough information as submitted. Still, it's better than posts spread randomly through the mailing lists... Current info listed is very simple: OS, CPU model + GHz rating, RAM, HDD, Req/Sec http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks If you are running any release of squid and can provide the same details with a better requests-per-second rate than one listed. Or a different H/W configuration we would like to know about it. Thanks. Amos > > > Adrian > > > 2008/7/16 Chris Robertson <crobertson@xxxxxxx>: >> Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: >>> >>> HI folks >>> >>> I already know that there is not a recipe for squid. But I wonder if >>> anyone knows an official document that lists squid requirements. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LD >>> >> >> That's a bit like asking "What kind of a car should I get?". You need >> to >> give some details of the expected workload. >> >> In general, get a higher clocked CPU, as much RAM and as many drives as >> you >> can afford, and use regex based ACLs sparingly. >> >> Chris >> >> >
