bill.allison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks. Pressure of work means that it will be a few days before I can
upgrade, but I will let you know when done. What should I consider when
deciding whether to go 3.0 or 2.7?
Starting from 2.5, it comes down to speed these days. As a guesstimate,
I think 2.7 can handle about 10% more requests per sec, than the current
3.0.
So, IMO, if you need the speed boost go 2.7. If you are comfortable
as-is, go 3.0.
Amos
-----Original Message-----
From: squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 10 July 2008 12:44
To: Bill Allison
Cc: lfferreira@xxxxxxxxx; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: POST + NTLM Authentica
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
bill.allison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi
I think this may be the same as I reported as bug 2176
(http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2176) against 2.6
STABLE17. Is it known to be fixed in 2.7 or 3.0?. Apologies for asking
-
I haven't had time yet to go through changes logs for subsequent
versions.
Ah if thats the bug, then unkown. It's still open. Primarily because we
have not ben able to get a usable trace in the current code to find out
whats causing it.
If you upgrade you will either see it disappear; at which point we can
get the others to test 2175 by upgrading themselves. Maybe closing the
issue off.
Or worst case it remains, at which point you are using a version we can
support you while debug tracking the issue down.
Amos
Bill A.
-----Original Message-----
From: squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 10 July 2008 05:28
To: lfferreira@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: POST + NTLM Authentica
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
--
Luiz Felipe Ferreira wrote:
Guys,
We have a squid-2.5STABLE14 with NTLM authentication.
Please upgrade. 2.5 has been obsolete for several years.
We currently support primarily 3.0stable7, and 2.7stable3 for those who
can't upgrade to 3.0x.
Either of which is a good upgrade form 2.5.
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7
