> Hi Amos > is this kind connection harmful for Squid daemon? I meant Besides Squid > drop this connection, would this kind of connection cause unstable to the > daemon ? Not. Squid dumps the TCP connection as soon as the error is found and reported. > > Also, how could I know the destination IP/host of this kind of connections > ? > I could find the client (source) IP address from access.log only. Squid never handled the request so never had the destination info. Amos > > Thanks > Best Regards, > S K > > > --- On Thu, 7/3/08, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: many "parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method" >> found >> To: lsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 11:35 PM >> Siu-kin Lam wrote: >> > Hi Amos >> > >> > Thanks for the reply. >> > I found most "unsupported method" in >> cache.log are control-code included. I think they are come >> from some BT clients. >> > >> >> Ah, in that case there is nothing that can be done in >> squid. >> You need to educate users on proper use of proxies with BT, >> if you think >> its worth the effort. >> >> Amos >> >> > Thanks >> > S K >> > >> > --- On Thu, 7/3/08, Amos Jeffries >> <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Subject: Re: many >> "parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method" found >> >> To: lsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 9:44 AM >> >> Siu-kin Lam wrote: >> >>> Dear all >> >>> >> >>> I am using version2.7 stable 3 as a proxy >> server. I >> >> have found many "parseHttpRequest: >> Unsupported >> >> method" in cache.log. >> >>> Is it possible to fix it? >> >> If you know what the methods are supposed to be. >> Squid 2.x >> >> has a >> >> squid.conf option extension_methods ... which >> allows you to >> >> name up to >> >> 20 new ones which are allowed through. >> >> >> >> >> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/cfgman/extension_methods.html >> >> >> >>> Also, could it change to allow any >> "Unsupported >> >> method" by default ? >> >> >> >> The change is not easy and we have already done it >> in Squid >> >> 3.1 >> >> (currently 3-HEAD) with no intentions on >> back-porting. >> >> >> >> Amos >> >> -- >> >> Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7 >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7 > > > >
