On tor, 2008-07-03 at 16:55 -0400, Chris Woodfield wrote: > So we're looking to upgrade from 2.6 to 2.7, primarily to get the HTTP/ > 1.1 header support. I realize that the full 1.1 spec is not completely > implemented, but are there any real "Danger, Will Robinson!" > implications? server_http11 is pretty safe to enable. Actually all of the http/1.1 stuff is quite safe to enable, but server_http11 more than the other. > Specifically, is there any functionality or access to content that > would be actively broken because squid is advertising HTTP/1.1 but > doesn't have the spec completely implemented? The main feature missing is forwarding of 1xx responses. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
