On sön, 2008-06-29 at 01:01 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > On lör, 2008-06-28 at 11:12 +0430, Armin ranjbar wrote: > > > >> Why there is no ZPH support for squid3 ? > > > > Because no one has contributed ZPH support to Squid-3. > > > > Define 'support'. We use the word in several ways here. > > - ZPH provide no patch? > 3.1 ... because its been merged into the squid 3-HEAD code for release > in squid 3.1. > 3.0 has a patch if you want to re-apply it yourself. Should work, but > we haven't tested it very much. Sorry, my error. Had forgot this was in fact contributed and accepted for 3.1. I am talking about code, not operational support. If my memory had worked better the correct answer above is It's in squid-3 and scheduled for the 3.1 release. The contribution didn't make it in time to get included in 3.0. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
