Search squid archive

Re: Squid3 - reason to migrate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia Wt Czerwca 10 2008, 04:19, Amos Jeffries napisał(a):
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any reason to migrate to Squid3 (or head snapshot 3.1)?
>> Did anybody do compare functions/performance between 2.6 and 3.x
>> version?
>>
>> I have high load (~400req/s) server with COSS filesystems and tproxy on
>> squid 2.6.18 (now tproxy doesn't work correctly, only transparent
>> proxy).
>>
>
> Under 600req/sec there is no noticible difference in 2.6+/3.x. Tproxy 4
> support may be a reason for you.

What's mean "Under 600req/sec"?
600req/sec on what hardware? Mayby I have slower server than You and there
will be noticable difference?

Tproxy 4.1 is important reason for me (mayby one and only).

> But the COSS support in 3 is buggy with nobody actively testing it.
> you are able to change FS or wanting to assist testing and debugging
> before you migrate, that may be a blocker problem.

It's strange that nobody testing it, it's very good fs.


Another question.
How stable is HEAD 3.1 with working Tproxy?
When will be released stable 3.1?

Regards,
-- 
Tomasz


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux