Just grab the SRPM and then rpmbuild --rebuild /path/to/squid-3.0.STABLE6-1.src.rpm and you get it freshly built for whatever Fedora/RedHat version you are using. On ons, 2008-05-21 at 19:46 -0500, Cliff Hayes wrote: > Henrik, > > I found the development version...but as you said it is for Fedora 10...I > would be concerned that there were some changes between 9 and 10 that might > break something. > > I don't have any clout with Fedora developers. I would think someone in > Squid development would have the influence and contacts required to get an > rpm created. Everyone who downloads Fedora 9 is going to have this basic > authentication problem, so I think there is a sufficient reason to get the > stable 6 out (if that fixes it). > > Also, I was going to try a fix mentioned in another email you replied to > today. The one about removing "transparent" from http_port. But, I don't > have transparent as an option. I don't have any options...just the port > number. > > Thanks, > > Cliff > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 5:22 PM > To: Cliff Hayes > Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Need RPM of squid3stable6 > > > On ons, 2008-05-21 at 15:44 -0500, Cliff Hayes wrote: > > > I'd like to try stable5 or 6 as announced, but need an RPM since I am > using > > Fedora 9. > > Fedora development is on 3.0.STABLE6. > > I don't know why FC9 haven't been updated yet, but you should be able to > use the Fedora development version. > > > Regards > Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
