Excellent news.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Manoj_Rajkarnikar" <manoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Marking Cached traffic..
Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Stephan Viljoen wrote:
HI There,
I was wondering whether it's posible to mark cached traffic with a
different TOS then uncached traffic. I need to come up with a way of
passing cached traffic through our bandwidth manager without taxing the
end
user for it. Basically giving them the full benefits of the proxy
server.
There's the http://zph.bratcheda.org/ stuff.
We've been using this one since the 2.5 days and is doing the job pretty
well. Seems quite stable. We're currently using 2.6S19.
I'm probably going to roll it into my private tree after I've stabilised
the codebase. Someone's asked me about it.
will we be seeing it in the mainline tree some time in the future ??
I've contacted the author about getting it into 3.1 or 3.2.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6.STABLE19 or 3.0.STABLE4
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
