More to the point, would a vendor only be obligated to provide the
source code directly (as opposed to providing a link to, say, squid's
main source repository) if the vendor made modifications to said
source code? Or is the vendor obligated to provide the source code
directly regardless, even if it's the same tarball that you'd download
from squid-cache.org?
-C
On Apr 11, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, S.KOBAYASHI wrote:
Hello guys,
I know that great squid is protected by GPL v2.
In hypothetic situation, if I distribute the squid binary as
appliance
server to customer to get earn some profits, will I be supposed to
hand in
the source code.
Yes.
Adrian
--
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial
Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in
WA -
