Amos: thank you very much. i appreciate you if give me some detail. 2008/3/28, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Ah a few problems with COSS. Firstly it does not handle large objects > very well. > Secondy its reload requires reading into memory the entire cache_dir > slice by slice. Which is extremely slow the larger the dir. > > You would get better performance splitting your cache into two > cache_dirs one COSS (max around 2GB) for small objects and one ufs/aufs > for large objects. > my every cache_dir disk capability is lager than 100G, and the cache box is server for very small files--this is the reason why i use COSS. as your advice, i need split the cache into about 50(or more) cache_dirs and several aufs for large objects( if exists)...is this? why it can get better performance splittint big cache into several cache_dirs? -- Best regards Felix New
