-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Amos, I've implemented the example you sent on Dynamic Content but so far i regret to say that no improvement has been made on the hit ratio I added the following to my squid.conf refresh_pattern (/cgi-bin/|\?) 0 0% 0 refresh_pattern . 0 20% 4320 acl mydomain dstdomain .mydomain.com cache allow mydomain my stats look something like this: 67.5103% TCP_MISS/200 6.07349% TCP_HIT/200 4.55681% TCP_MEM_HIT/200 1.59761% TCP_IMS_HIT/304 Any help is appreciated. Thanks Amos Jeffries wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: >> G'day, >> >> Just remove the QUERY ACL and the cache ACL line using "QUERY" in it. >> Then turn on header logging (log_mime_hdrs on) and see if the replies >> to the dynamically generated content is actually giving caching info. >> >> >> >> Adrian > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent > > Amos > >> >> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008, Saul Waizer wrote: > Hello List, > > I am having problems trying to cache images*/content that comes from a > URL containing a question mark on it ('?') > > Background: > I am running squid Version 2.6.STABLE17 on FreeBSD 6.2 as a reverse > proxy to accelerate content hosted in America served in Europe. > > The content comes from an application that uses TOMCAT so a URL > requesting dynamic content would look similar to this: > > http://domain.com/storage/storage?fileName=/.domain.com-1/usr/14348/image/thumbnail/th_8837728e67eb9cce6fa074df7619cd0d193_1_.jpg > > > The result of such request always results on a MISS with a log similar > to this: > > TCP_MISS/200 8728 GET http://domain.com/storage/storage? - > FIRST_UP_PARENT/server_1 image/jpg > > I've added this to my config: acl QUERY urlpath_regex cgi-bin as you can > see bellow but it makes no difference and I tried adding this: > acl QUERY urlpath_regex cgi-bin \? and for some reason ALL requests > result in a MISS. > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > My squid config looks like this: (obviously real ip's were changed) > > ################# STANDARD ACL'S ############################### > acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 > acl manager proto cache_object > acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255 > acl to_localhost dst 127.0.0.0/8 > ################# REVERSE CONFIG FOR SITE ##### > http_port 80 accel vhost > cache_peer 1.1.1.1 parent 80 0 no-query originserver name=server_1 > acl sites_server_1 dstdomain domain.com > ################# REVERSE ACL'S FOR OUR DOMAINS ############## > acl ourdomain0 dstdomain www.domain.com > acl ourdomain1 dstdomain domain.com > http_access allow ourdomain0 > http_access allow ourdomain1 > http_access deny all > icp_access allow all > ################ HEADER CONTROL ############### > visible_hostname cacheA.domain.com > cache_effective_user nobody > forwarded_for on > follow_x_forwarded_for allow all > header_access All allow all > ############### SNMP CONTROL ############### > snmp_port 161 > acl snmppublic snmp_community public1 > snmp_access allow all > ############## CACHE CONTROL ################ > access_log /usr/local/squid/var/logs/access.log squid > acl QUERY urlpath_regex cgi-bin > cache_mem 1280 MB > cache_swap_low 95 > cache_swap_high 98 > maximum_object_size 6144 KB > minimum_object_size 1 KB > maximum_object_size_in_memory 4096 KB > cache_dir ufs /storage/ram_dir1 128 16 256 > cache_dir ufs /storage/cache_dir1 5120 16 256 > cache_dir ufs /storage/cache_dir2 5120 16 256 > cache_dir ufs /storage/cache_dir3 5120 16 256 > > Also here is the result of a custom script I made to parse the > access.log that will sort and display the top 22 responses so I can > compare them with cacti, I am trying to increase the Hit ratio but so > far is extremely low. > > 1 571121 69.3643% TCP_MISS/200 > 2 98432 11.9549% TCP_HIT/200 > 3 51590 6.26576% TCP_MEM_HIT/200 > 4 47009 5.70938% TCP_MISS/304 > 5 17757 2.15664% TCP_IMS_HIT/304 > 6 11982 1.45525% TCP_REFRESH_HIT/200 > 7 11801 1.43327% TCP_MISS/404 > 8 6810 0.827095% TCP_MISS/500 > 9 2508 0.304604% TCP_MISS/000 > 10 1323 0.160682% TCP_MISS/301 > 11 1151 0.139792% TCP_MISS/403 > 12 1051 0.127647% TCP_REFRESH_HIT/304 > 13 430 0.0522248% TCP_REFRESH_MISS/200 > 14 127 0.0154245% TCP_CLIENT_REFRESH_MISS/200 > 15 83 0.0100806% TCP_MISS/401 > 16 81 0.00983769% TCP_CLIENT_REFRESH_MISS/304 > 17 35 0.00425085% TCP_MISS/503 > 18 20 0.00242906% TCP_DENIED/400 > 19 19 0.00230761% TCP_HIT/000 > 20 19 0.00230761% TCP_DENIED/403 > 21 14 0.00170034% TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 > 22 1 0.000121453% TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/30 > > Thanks! > > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2ugEAcr37anguZsRAixSAJ9GioRmL42D1bOSVveMKYcpi21fygCfd4VP UMqi1CB3vQ5IeaTblK/vYQM= =6XUg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
