fre 2008-02-22 klockan 16:20 -0800 skrev Neil Harkins: > most site administrators know what's cacheable or not on their site, > and could craft regex to differentiate thus collapsed_forwarding > being acl-based would be extremely beneficial, but it appears > to be global on/off today. is this conclusion correct? are there > any architectural reasons why it would be a bad idea? Only reason why it isn't acl driven is that it's not implemented that way yet. There was no acl requirements in the specificatios when the feature was developed, an no one has implemented an acl check for it after.. Technically and administratively it would be a good thing. Reards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
