Search squid archive

Re: cache peer proxy-only - is there a middle ground?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Woodfield wrote:
Hi all,

I'm facing an issue where we'd like to implement cache peering on our squid farms, primarily to leverage the combined disk capacity across all our boxes into a larger cache. I would presume that this requires the use of the proxy-only directive to avoid content duplication. However, this has raised the issue of server overload - there's a very real possibility that a single hot object, if it only lives on a single server, could overload that server with requests from all the other peers in the event of a flash crowd. I'd like to find some middle ground.

I'm wondering if there's a way to configure squid such that content retrieved from peers is cached locally, but for a much shorter period of time than content the cache retrieves directly. Is this possible within squid, or should this be a feature request?

Squid contains a few methods for reduction of ICP requests. Primarily the use of Cache Digests and to a lesser degree multicast-ICP.

http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/CacheDigests

I think you possibly may be able to hack some ACLs that prevent disk storage but leave items in the hot-memory cache. Though I have never looked at that myself.

Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux