On 24.01.08 11:59, Manoj_Rajkarnikar wrote: > From: Manoj_Rajkarnikar <manoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:59:24 +0545 (NPT) > Subject: Re: Mem Cache flush > To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx please send mail only to the list. I'm not subscribed to read/answer private replies. > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >you seem to have 4 cache_dirs on each of those 2 disks. It's useless and > >inefficient. Just use one cache_dir per disk (unless you use different > >storages, e.g. COSS) > Hmm... so if I use only cache_dir per disk, I think I'll need to increase > the first level directory too.. I currently have ~4M objects in my cache > split onto 2 disks (~2M objects per disk). so as I understand, > > 2M objects / (256 objects per 2nd level dir x 256 2nd level dirs per 1st > level dir) = ~ 30+ 1st level dirs.. Am I calculating wrong here?? Please > also give some hints on how would it ineffeciently effect squid by > putting multiple cache_dirs on single disk... yes, although I'd use 32 first level directories, I like that number more :) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity...
