Search squid archive
cache disk failure handling?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: cache disk failure handling?
- From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:56:17 -0500
Hi,
Reading the squid FAQ, it's obvious to me that putting cache_dirs on a
RAID (particularly RAID5) has serious performance penalties and is
highly discouraged. However, what's not as clear is how squid deals
with single-disk failures and whether or not it handles failures
gracefully enough to obviate the need for RAID.
If I have a squid running multiple cache_dirs on single disks, and one
disk suffers a failure, how does squid respond? Will it simply stop
using that cache_dir and soldier on, or can this cause an application
crash?
Also, when starting up squid, what is the effect of an unavailable
cache_dir? I'm thinking of a situation where squid is restarted before
a bad disk can be replaced.
If squid does have problems here, could using pairs of RAID1
partitions be an acceptable compromise, with the cost of reduced total
storage?
Thanks,
-Chris
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Samba]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Linux USB]
[Yosemite News]