On Mon, Jan 21, 2008, Monah Baki wrote: > Hi Tek, > > I am planning on moving 1500 users to the proxy, ofcourse the system > will change (hardware wise). Performance of squid should be > important, I knew diskd was still in "test" mode, but I did not > expect 4 users even though it was running for 27 days to display this > error messages. > For my own info, if I move to ufs, and if ufs is pretty stable, > performance wise is it close to diskd or better. Move it to AUFS, UFS isn't (currently) going to be very high performing. Diskd wasn't intended to be "testing"; it just turned out that the design made a couple of flawed assumptions about the rest of the Squid codebase. As always, I've got ideas on how to fix that; who knows when that'll happen. Adrian -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
