Thanks for your help guys, It sounds like ufdbGuard is the way for me to go. -----Original Message----- From: Marcus Kool [mailto:marcus.kool@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008 11:31 PM To: Mike Rambo Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Google Images and Blacklists squidGuard has indeed safe search functionality by using a regular expression substitution mechanism. Unfortunately, the substitution has to be done for ALL Google domains. sguidGuard also does not have safesearch examples for Yahoo, Ask.com excite.com, MSN.com live.com etc. With ufdbGuard an administrator only has to add 'safe-search on' in the configuration file and SafeSearch is enabled for all Google domains and all major search engines. The implementation does not use regular expressions and is much faster. Marcus Mike Rambo wrote: > Brett Lymn wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:38:45PM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: >>> if you suppress the use of cookies for a google service, you won't get >>> use specifc preferences (ie the default in image search is the moderate >>> safesearch)... if you do it for all of google.com obviosuly it has >>> negative implications for things like gmail. >>> >> >> You can force the google image safesearch on by rewriting the URL to >> add an argument to the search string. I know of one commercial >> product that actually does this to try and prevent the thumbnail >> viewing loophole. >> > > squidGuard has done this unofficially (via a patch) for a couple of > years and does so now officially as of the recent 1.3 release (though by > default it is set for full safe search. I'd expect moderate safe should > be possible too). > >
