> * Alex Rousskov <rousskov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > The above summary is inaccurate, IMO. Currently, Squid3 is better for > > some production environments and Squid2 is better for some other > > production environments. If you need ICAP/eCAP, SSL Bump, IPv6, or other > > new features, try Squid3. If you do not need those features, there is no > > pressure and you can benefit from Squid2 proven stability and recent > > improvements that have not been ported to Squid3 yet. On 20.12.07 20:19, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > I recently switchteed to 3.0 and found it (for my purposed) to be MORE > stable than 2.6.x, which would crash ever so often what's "the" purpose? I don't remember I've seen 2.6 crash... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...
