On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 12:53 -0500, Steve Snyder wrote: > On Thursday 20 December 2007 12:13:03 pm Alex Rousskov wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:43 +0000, Tony Dodd wrote: > > > Jason wrote: > > > > I'm about to build a cache for a production environment. Which do > > > > I want, 2.7 or 3.0? If you have time for a detailed answer, what > > > > are the differences? BTW, this will be an intercepting/transparent > > > > proxy via iptables. > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > You want 2.6STABLE17 right now, and 2.7 when it is released. =] 3.0 > > > isn't really ready for a production environment yet. > > > > The above summary is inaccurate, IMO. Currently, Squid3 is better for > > some production environments and Squid2 is better for some other > > production environments. If you need ICAP/eCAP, SSL Bump, IPv6, or > > other new features, try Squid3. If you do not need those features, > > there is no pressure and you can benefit from Squid2 proven stability > > and recent improvements that have not been ported to Squid3 yet. > > Can you point me/us to a description of "SSL Bump" and what benefits it > bring to a web proxy? Please see http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslBump The code is available via the ssl-bump CVS branch. It will be committed to Squid3 HEAD in January, for Squid v3.1 release. Alex.
