Search squid archive

Re: question about filesystems and directories for cache.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Robertson wrote:
First of all, thanks for sharing the write-up. There are a number of high-load squid installations (Wikipedia, and Flikr are two of the largest I know of), but not much information on what tweaks to make in the interest of performance.
No problem. =] I encountered the same problem when trying to figure out how to get more performance so I figured once I'd cracked it, the least I could do was document it for the other people having the same issue (and to give myself a reference for later).

After perusing your posting, I'm wondering if you would run a "squidclient -p 80 mgr:info |grep method". I'm making the assumption that your squid is listening on port 80, so please change the argument to -p if needed. Your configuration options included "--enable-poll", but with a 2.6 kernel and 2.6 sources, I would be surprised if you are not actually using epoll. It might be a superfluous compile option.
[root@cache1 ~]# squidclient -p 8081 mgr:info |grep method
       IO loop method:                     poll
Cache digests are not the only method of sharing between peers. ICP is an alternative and I have read that multicast works well for scaling beyond a handful of peers. I can't seem to find the posting now that I want to reference it. I'd trust your experience over my memory of someone else's posting, but I thought I would raise the possibility.
I was under the impression that when utilizing cache peering, it worked better if the squids had a digest of what was on X squid server, before asking for it. I could be wrong on that though - Adrian, care to comment on this one? It's now redundant in my situation though, as every peering mechanism is slower than going back to parent in our use case.
I'm surprised you had to specify your hosts file in your squid.conf. /etc/hosts is the default.
There are a couple of bugs in squid that seem to cause issues if you don't actually specify the hosts file within the squid conf... worst case, it's an extra line of config to parse on startup.

Lastly, I'd be wary of specifying dns_nameservers as a squid.conf option. Squid will use the servers specified in /etc/resolv.conf if this option is not specified. Now you have to maintain name servers in two locations.
Same goes here; DNS lookups were taking 200-1000ms without specifying dns_nameservers in the config (the nameservers specified there are the same ones within /etc/resolv.conf), now they're sub 1ms. There isn't much chance of us re-ip-ing internally, so it's a pretty safe config option for us. I definitely agree that it could cause problems for people using public DNS resolution though.

--
Tony Dodd, Systems Administrator

Last.fm | http://www.last.fm
Karen House 1-11 Baches Street
London N1 6DL

check out my music taste at:
http://www.last.fm/user/hawkeviper

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux