Yes. Although your setup behaves better under high load for longer. I stopped using Diskd myself because of bug #761. although I must admit that I had not experienced any issues on my servers when I was using it. Maybe one of the developers on the list can clarify. Is it the case that diskd crashes under high load, but other systems will have reached high load and crashed long before diskd;) J On Nov 14, 2007 10:56 AM, Dave Raven <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have seen the error messages before, but not during these tests. diskd definitely seems to delay the time-till-crash by a lot - as I understand it the problems in diskd are crashes under high load, not that it slows it down right? > > Thanks for the help > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: redsnapper8t8@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:redsnapper8t8@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Moylan > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:39 PM > To: Dave Raven > Subject: Re: Squid Performance (with Polygraph) > > > Doesn't diskd have a bug whereby it has issues under heavy load. > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=761 . If so, I am > surprised that it is behaving best under heavy load. > http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.6/squid-2.6.STABLE16-RELEASENOTES.html > > J > >
