Hi, --- Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'll have to look some more into it later on. Squid > could probably > be patched to do what you're using Apache for.. > > > Adrian > > That will be great, but what I don't understand is why they don't want to make such a static object cacheable. Microsoft, Google, and those whose traffic take up most of the Internet's capacity should make their content cacheable so as to help all of us. At some periods windowsupdate.com takes up about 10% of total traffic with virtually no significant HITs. Thanks, solomon.
