On fre, 2007-09-21 at 19:20 -0600, kevin@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > send in plain text only. No idea why it came up with all that HTML. Forgive > me if it happens again. I sent the following: Looks better.. > The config which I hope will work follows. It seems no one is using the > bandwidth right now (Friday, I guess) and have late results which are > positive from someone in the "fast" pool. So, does the following acl and > delay pool definitions look OK?? (Thanks in advance; Kevin): > > > acl fast src 192.168.3.1-192.168.3.79/255.255.255.0 > acl medium src 192.168.3.80-192.168.3.120/255.255.255.0 > acl slow src 192.168.3.200-192.168.3.250/255.255.255.0 Drop the netmasks from those. Not doing what you want. (see output of "squid -k parse") Other than that is looks fine. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
