On ons, 2007-09-19 at 13:56 +0800, Ding Deng wrote: > I have to admit that I am in a setup that LVS routes traffic to Squid > boxes through private network, and Squid response directly to clients > ;-( That's fine. LVS DR forwarding method is a lot more efficient and less stressful to the LVS router, allowing you to scale much much better. Just requires a slightly more complicated setup as you shown, with both a private and the public IP on each server, but only slightly as long as there is no router hops between LVS and the servers. If there is router hops between then LVS TUN or LVS NAT must be used, and I would recommend LVS NAT in such setups as using TUN has a number of other drawbacks.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
