On mån, 2007-09-17 at 10:43 +0530, Shailesh Mishra wrote: > Hi, > > I got to know that only ICAP responses 100, 200 and 204 are supported. > Any idea when the responses 201 will be supported. Seeing 201 in ICAP do not make much sense to me. The 201 status code do not have a clear mapping to ICAP context, but I guess you have an ICAP server which sometimes sends 201 when 200 is expected so I guess it should work to just accept it as if it was a 200 response.. The definition of 201 is quite different from 200. > The comment in the source files says its in the to-do list. Yes and no.. it says that it's on the TODO to consider if supporting 201 responses is a good idea or not.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
