Search squid archive

Re: poor performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:26:20 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > On 30-Aug-07 My Secret NSA Wiretap Overheard Lutieri G. Saying  :  
> > > /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local)
> > > devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
> > > /dev/da0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > /dev/da0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > /dev/da0s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > /dev/da0s2a on /cache (ufs, local, soft-updates)
> > > devfs on /var/chroot/named/dev (devfs, local)  
> 
> On 30.08.07 12:20, Nicole wrote:
> > I am curious why you opted for a seperate slice for the /cache?
> > I found that to be slower than just having a seperate partition, as
> > odd as that seems.  
> 
> pardon, he has separate _partition_ - 1 and 2 are partitions, a to f
> are slices. 

No, it's the other way round. FreeBSD uses the term partition for its
own native partitions. The slice is the non-native partition into
which they fit. 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux