On ons, 2007-08-29 at 11:19 -0700, ToddWilliams wrote: > More info about that "subsequent request" -- it is a history.back() > javascript call. Heh.. history navigation is a bit special in many browsers.. and rightfully so as users want to really go back when using back, not have the request resubmitted to the server. Any code relying on either behaviour when using back will have a hard time as there is no guarantees for either result.. > But as I said, that fails when we use squid (goes into an infinite loop), > but works fine when we use a different proxy (such as Apache mod_proxy or > CCproxy) which sends HTTP/1.1 headers. It's not at all impossible IE behaves differently when seeing HTTP/1.0. But it should not.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
