Search squid archive

Re: FreeBSD Squid timeout issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,
Thanks for your suggestions. I checked my squid.conf and the acls for chat and spyware were of type dstdomain, porn was url_regexp, i changed that to dstdomain and now when i do a squid -k reconfigure i am getting syntax errors. AS for the file sizes chat has 2 lines, spyware has 1440 lines, and of course the big one the porn rejection file has 15025 lines. The error i'm repeatedly getting now and i didn't get it when the file was url_regexp was that i have subdomains of parent domains and they are ignored. Does anyone use spyware, porn, and chat rejections, and if so where did you obtain them? Also, i'm wondering why my cache isn't clearing out the oldest items, is my cache replacement policy bad?
Thanks.
Dave.

----- Original Message ----- From: <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re:  FreeBSD Squid timeout issue


Hello,
    Thanks for all replies.
    I've got a good hard disk, i've been checking that and haven't found
any
problems or seen any error msgs in my logs.
    I've adjusted my high cache size from 100% to 95% but i'm starting to
look at is squid purging oldest items from my cache? It seems like when
the
cache gets full or nearly so i start having this issue?
    As for my pornography and spyware rejection files they are each a
considerable size, they are lists of sites i don't want visited,
downloaded,
or to have anything to do with. If there's a way to speed this up i'm all
for it.
Thanks.
Dave.


Make sure that you are using dst or dstdomain as the ACL types on teh
lareg lists instead of regex.
The regex is quite slow and large lists often become a drag. After
splitting the lists into 'need regex' and dstdomain eth speed increase is
still often worth the extra time spent maintaining two lists.

Make sure there is extra space on the cache disk. All the tutorials
mention making the cache 60%-80% of drive size. I can't recall what the
exact reasons were but it had something to do with OS-level handling on
the drive.

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux