sön 2007-06-24 klockan 14:52 +0200 skrev Andreas Pettersson: > I was actually having a thought about that.. Is a url hash the only way > to go? > It is easy for a phisher to wildcard a whole subdirectory or even a > subdomain and make hashing of individual urls nearly useless. > Perhaps there should be an optional list of domains or dst adresses for > blocking the hosts obviously used only for phishing. The Google lookup algorithm deals with that pretty efficiently, using MD5 hashes which makes it very easy to scale in number of entries. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
