mån 2007-06-11 klockan 14:42 -0500 skrev Dave Dykstra: > Two different processes > can't open the same address & port on Linux, but one process can open a > socket and pass it to two forked children. So, I have modified > squid2.6STABLE13 to accept a command line option with a file descriptor > of an open socket to use instead of opening its own socket. I then > wrote a small perl script to open the socket and fork/exec the two > squids. This is working and I am now getting around 230MB/s throughput > according to the squid SNMP statistics. > > Does this sound like a reasonable way to do it? Yes. > Do you have a preferred > way to do it? Yours sound good to me. Why do it differently? The only thing I might do differently is to also support the passed filedescriptor to be passed as stdin making the startup more like how inetd starts such servers.. > If I cleaned up my patch and submitted it, is there a > chance it could get picked up for inclusion in the standard squid > distribution so I don't need to maintain it myself? Yes. Just submit it as a enhancement request in bugzilla, or mail squid-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
