tor 2007-05-24 klockan 17:56 -0400 skrev David Seltzer: > At the moment my config for the servers looks like this: > > cache_peer app2 parent 8080 0 no-query originserver round-robin weight=1 > cache_peer app1 parent 8080 0 no-query originserver round-robin weight=4 Ok. > My first question is: Does the weight parameter affect the way that MISS requests are passed on? > My experiments lead me to believe the answer is yes, but I'm not quite sure how. Does this example mean that app2 should get 1/4th of the hits or 1/5th of the hits? yes. > My second question, is: Should I be using CARP instead? I've had no luck in trying to get it to work, and the only reason I can > think of is that maybe CARP doesn't apply in a situation where I'm not using ICP between servers. Squid only implements inter-array CARP forwarding, not intra-array CARP forwarding. As a result it's only usable in forwarding requests to an array of caches, not for optimizing the forwarding within an array of caches. But it is possible to build a two-layer structure on the same servers, by running a non-caching CARP frontend layer connecting to the caching Squids. But it's not much related to forwarding of requests to the origin servers. Here weighted round-robin is probably the best unless you need to keep session state on the servers.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
