I just tried using 150.125.125.186 (closest IP) as the wccp2_router address and the router ID as the GRE endpoint as you recommended but the router would not negotiate with squid. The cache server would not show up at all when doing a: sh ip wccp. So then I switched them. Router ID as the wccp2_address and closest IP as the GRE endpoint. Now I have the same problem as before where I get the mis-match on the I_See_You packets. Can you think of anything else? Like I said, this work with protocol 1. Also, the only other strange config I have is that my GRE interface is a real routable IP (150.125.125.187/29). Most of the documents I see say to use the same IP as eth0 but with a 32 bit mask. When I do this I get the protocol 47 ICMP unreachable error in tcpdump. thoughts? Thanks, -- Chad On 5/10/07, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tor 2007-05-10 klockan 09:19 -0400 skrev Chad Harrelson: > Hi Henrik, thanks for your continued help. I changed the GRE tunnel > end point and the wccp2_router statement to match the router id of > 150.125.127.142 but now squid and the router don't negotiate. As you > can see here below, there is a mismatch in the I_See_You packet IDs. Hmm.. try using the closest interface address as wccp2_router but the router ID address as GRE endpoint.. Regards Henrik
