Aaahhhh, I see your point. I wasn't thinking before I spoke. To bypass the normal route to the outside world would be in violation of our security policy and would set a precedent that I don't think our CIO is ready to defend Paul Fiero, RHCE Information Security Analyst Communications and Technology Management Office City of Austin (512) 974-3559 =========================================================== The information contained in this ELECTRONIC MAIL transmission is confidential. It may also be a privileged work product or proprietary information. This information is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution [other than to the addressee(s)], copying or taking of any action because of this information is strictly prohibited. =========================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 12:26 PM To: Fiero, Paul Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Squid + Policy-Based Routing +LoadBalancing/Clustering??? lör 2007-04-28 klockan 22:10 -0500 skrev Fiero, Paul: > Ack, that isn't the answer I was looking for. We do a load balancer > that we could use but, unfortunately it means traffic would go from > the router, through the firewall, through the load balancer, to squid, > back through the load balancer, back through the firewall then out to > the internet and then it would return through that path. Why? The load balancer path is only for traffic Clients->Squid, how Squid then fetches the content is irrelevant. Regards Henrik
