Thanks If you create ICAP support in HAVP you "kill two rabbits" ;) ICAP support need for big nets, for speed up scan process Example 5 servers scan for virus over icap and 5 squid over wccp cache objects :) this clustercacheengine It will be more powerful CISCO Cacheengine ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3507.txt -----Original Message----- From: Henrik Krohns [mailto:hege@xxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:35 AM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Re: Antivir scan big file problem with ICAP On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > ons 2007-03-28 klockan 17:58 +0300 skrev Henrik Krohns: > > > PS. There is really not much advantage in using ICAP versus Parent > > in normal use. But I'm looking into adding ICAP support to HAVP in > > the future, since it seems to be a magic word. :) > > The big thing with ICAP is that it doesn't change the network > relations of the proxy. It can still participate with other proxies > etc even if the "ICAP based scanner" is plugged in. You can easily create sandwich which loops back to the same Squid instance, I recommend that with HAVP. It doesn't create much additional load, since with ICAP you usually transfer the same network traffic back and forth anyway. But I agree that with ICAP you can get a slighly more clear setup. Cheers, Henrik
