On 3/26/07, James Sutherland <J.A.Sutherland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LFUDA should be a close approximation to the result the original poster wanted: anything getting hit only by a robot will still not be 'frequently' used, so although it will be cached initially, it will soon be evicted again.
Yes, it's a nice idea too. I didn't benchmark the different policies but it seems to be a good choice anyway from the papers I've read. Thanks for the idea. -- Guillaume
