Search squid archive

RE: Oom-killer and Squid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Adrian, I'll give them a shot.
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:48 PM
To: Dave Rhodes
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Oom-killer and Squid


On Fri, Mar 09, 2007, Dave Rhodes wrote:
> Henrik,
> Sorry for the late reply, I've changed the cache_mem to 250MB and I am

> monitoring the growth.  The server does have 6GB of RAM.  The swap is 
> small based on SuSE recommendations  but I can add swap if necessary.
> 
> Last night the squid proc grew to over 2GB so I lowered the cache_mem 
> and restarted squid to free the 2GB.  The current size is 765MB and 
> I'm hoping it will level off at just over 1GB.  If it continues to 
> grow beyond 2GB then I'm guessing it's the malloc issue.
> 
> "dlmalloc" isn't an option, as I understand it, as it is limited to 
> 2GB. Know of any good 64bit compatible mallocs?

linux libc malloc isn't bad. The google malloc seems 64 bit happy.



Adrian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux