More info: I decided to restart squid and it refused. At that point it appears that the redirector process ran away and the load went through the roof. I ended up having to take it down hard. After restarting, the box I found this in cache.log 2007/02/06 14:14:20| /var/spool/squid/10: (2) No such file or directory FATAL: Failed to verify one of the swap directories, Check cache.log for details. Run 'squid -z' to create swap directories if needed, or if running Squid for the first time. Squid Cache (Version 2.6.STABLE5): Terminated abnormally. CPU Usage: 0.240 seconds = 0.156 user + 0.084 sys Maximum Resident Size: 0 KB Page faults with physical i/o: 1 So.... I ran the proscribed switch which I figure cost me two months worth of cache, and squid went back to running just fine. Any ideas as to what happened so that I might avoid it in the future? Thanks Chris On 2/6/07, Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all, I have been working on this problem now for a day or so. I'm running 2.6.STABLE5. Towards the end of last week various pages begin to be slow resolving and often required several F5's to finally load. The problem changed over the weekend to pages not resolving at all but being redirected to the search provided by the external dns servers we use (opendns). Bypassing squid and connecting directly to the Internet, using the same dns servers clears the problem up. Dig shows that the zone files in the dns servers are correct for the urls having problems. This would seem to eliminate the dns servers as the issue. I think. The cache.log shows no unusual entries. Access.log shows the url's being requested. The only thing that appears different as far as I can see is the rcode section of the Internal DNS page of cachemanager. Here it is: Internal DNS Statistics: The Queue: DELAY SINCE ID SIZE SENDS FIRST SEND LAST SEND ------ ---- ----- ---------- --------- Nameservers: IP ADDRESS # QUERIES # REPLIES --------------- --------- --------- 208.67.222.222 62 62 208.67.220.220 0 0 192.168.0.2 0 0 Rcode Matrix: RCODE ATTEMPT1 ATTEMPT2 ATTEMPT3 0 107751 79 35 1 0 0 0 2 2369 2268 2224 3 988 21 7 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Before this issue came up, I never remember seeing anything beyond the 0 row. I was not able to figure out what this matrix is telling me or if it is relevant to the problem I am experiencing. Any help is greatly appriciated. Chris