tor 2007-02-01 klockan 12:00 -0200 skrev Michel Santos: > depends how you look at it > disk space is cheap and serving one 650MB object is a fat win even if it > happens only twice a month The only problem is that the bigger cache the more memory you may need as there is an almost direct relation between the memory usage of Squid and the amount of objects in your cache. Allowing bigger objects helps reducing the memory usage, but at the same time there is nothing which guarantees there will be bigger objects cached so memory calculation needs to take this into account.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
