Henrik Nordstrom disse na ultima mensagem: > lör 2007-01-20 klockan 06:50 -0200 skrev Michel Santos: > > And squid.conf or cache.log? > please read again my former msg where I answered this >> squid when running transparent mode is marking "x-forwarded request-IP, >> my-outgoing-IP" isn't it? > > Squid always add an x-forwarded-for header with the original client IP > unless told not to. No matter if it's configured for transparent > interception or not. why you then said in your former msg that you do not understand what I mean with x-forward ? > >> so it seems that squid1 or squid2, when running on 127*, do NOT >> understand >> when my-outgoing-IP is 127.0.0.1 but does when it is any other >> >> or is it possible that squid assumes getting just forwarded packages by >> the OS when running on 127* but not already forwarded packages from a >> peer? > > Squid is a TCP application. It does not know or care about packets. we know that all do we? But I ask your pardon for not using the perfect correct expression here. > > >> squid0 do *NOT* go direct since I have >> >> never_direct allow all >> always_direct deny all > > Ok. Which leaves unique_hostname as the mist likely candidate. But you perhaps you remember that we talked about this already and that unique_host name is proper set, so we do not need to look at this again? But who knows there is a misty drude in my system who each time I close my squid configs change the unique host names in common host names. Any hint how I can catch the beast? > still have not told which error is seen, if there is anything logged in > cache.log on either of the Squids, or what your configuration looks like > so I can only guess. ok, you must have hooked in here without reading the thread from the beginning. My first message asking for help states the errors and has a link to the cache.log(s) > >> ok, I will do it this days, but may be you like to look meanwhile where >> squid get confused here because you said this should be the same on all >> squid versions. Since there are no extra configurations for this case in >> 2.6, my 2.5 config should work I guess. > > I don't know what to look for. > I must be on the wrong mailing list then ... Michel ... **************************************************** Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais. ****************************************************
