tis 2007-01-16 klockan 20:20 -0500 skrev Travis Derouin: > Hi, > > I have a few issues that I thought someone might have some advice on. > > I read in the documentation that url_rewrite_program was no longer > required as it was possible to force a domain name, ie. if Squid > received a request for www1.wikihow.com, you could issue a 301 > redirect to www.wikihow.com. Yes. This is done by denying the request and using deny_info to redirect the browser to the correct URL. > http_port 80 defaultsite=www.wikihow.com vhost > > Is that correct, or should it be something else? The above says you are running an accelerator with domain based virtual host support, and old HTTP/1.0 clients not sending Host headers will get be processed as requests for the www.wikihow.com domain. > FATAL: Too many queued url_rewriter requests (72 on 12) > > This didn't seem to be a problem on our other server which was running > 2.6.STABLE3-20060825, which we just moved off of recently. The new > server is currently only getting half of the total traffic the old > server was receiving. Odd.. Squid-2.6 is the same as 2.5 there.. > 2 questions: Could this be a problem particular to 2.6STABLE6? Are > there any serious drawbacks to having a lot of url_rewrite_children ? Main drawback is memory usage by the helper instances. What is the URL-rewriter used for? And what does it do? IF it's just local processing of the URL with no external lookups then a single helper instance is sufficient, but requires the helper to be modified to use the "concurrent" protocol. > Ideally I'd like a configuration that doesn't rely on > url_rewrite_program, I haven't figured out the configuration for that > yet though. If you described for what purpose you use the url rewriter helper then we maybe could help you with that. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel