tis 2006-12-05 klockan 15:30 -0800 skrev Ben Drees: > test server. There is no fancy authorization happening. Are there any > well known configuration issues that could be causing this? Even if the > hits are on disk rather than in memory, the TCP_IMS_HIT case should only > need to consult an in-memory index structure and reply with a 304, right? Is there any Vary: responses involved? With the introduction of Vary and ETag the border between TCP_HIT and TCP_MISS is even more blurred than before.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
