On Dim, nov 12 2006 - 12:41, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > lör 2006-11-11 klockan 14:42 +0100 skrev Joel CARNAT: > > Hi, > > > > looking at Squid result codes I found: > > TCP_HIT = object in the cache. > > TCP_MEM_HIT = object in the cache and in memory. > > > > I did not found any "object in the cache and in the disk". > > The cache consists of the disk. Shadow copies may also be in memory. So > the above is TCP_HIT. > > Both TCP_HIT and TCP_MEM_HIT is full cache hits. The only differece is > where Squid had to get the cached data. > > > The idea is just to sum'up HITS correctly in RRDtool :) > > Easier to plot the SNMP counters.. > well, in fact I'm doing both (plotting from SNMP entries and from parsing the logs) and results didn't matched each time. with SNMP, I found: SQUID-MIB::cacheHttpHits.0 = Counter32: 3 SQUID-MIB::cacheHttpErrors.0 = Counter32: 0 no reference to "Hits from memory". so I was wondering if I was not mistaking thinking: SQUID-MIB::cacheHttpHits = LOG/TCP_HIT + LOG/TCP_MEM_HIT another way to put this down is: If I use SNMP, I don't have the info about where was the object. If I use log parsing, the detail is there and I have to sum TCP_HIT and TCP_MEM_HIT to get the full hit number. or there another option that I missed. Regards, Jo
