On 19.09.06 09:56, Michał Margula wrote: > Hardware is 2 x Xeon 3.6, 2GB RAM, SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic > 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI on Intel E7520. > > Now in topic of COSS, what is better solution (/dev/sdc is 36 GB and > /dev/sdd also will be 36 GB, same disk model): > 1) /dev/sdc and /dev/sdc used in full with AUFS and 1GB file of COSS in > memory > 2) /dev/sdc with AUFS and /dev/sdd with COSS (wouldn't be 36 GB too much?) > 3) /dev/sdc splitted for COSS and AUFS (if yes, what ratio of > splitting), /dev/sdd with AUFS > 4) /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd splitted for COSS and AUFS > > I thought that (1) would be OK. What do you think? What is recommended > size of COSS file? I would use the 4), decrease cache_disk for both disks and create ~1GB file for COSS on both disks. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Chernobyl was an Windows 95 beta test site.
