I'm sorry you didn't get this earlier. Thanks Joost for prodding me towards tcpdump. Regards Fog_Watch. Begin forwarded message: Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:50:40 +1000 From: Ian <db5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Ian <db5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: (110) Connection timed out, but Privoxy can? Actually, cancel that. I strongly suspect that Henrik's post (http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg12596.html) will solve the problem. So that is section 4.8 of http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ_long.html. Sorry for the bother. Regards Fog_Watch. On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:11:08 +1000 Ian <db5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On my Gentoo box are a chrooted Squid-2.5.STABLE14 and a Privoxy. I can use both to browse with almost no problem. > > If I perform a search at "http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/search.php"; using Squid the error returned is "(110) Connection timed out". The Privoxy on the same box, and an IPCop Squid on a different box, perform the search without fault. After clicking on "Search" at linuxquestions nothing is logged in /var/log/squid. > > I cannot see how the problem is not Squid. Nor can I see how Squid is the problem. Yes, I have good eye sight, and I'll let you be the judge of the thing between my ears. > > The squid.conf that achieves the error is as follows: > shutdown_lifetime 5 seconds > chroot /chroot/squid/ > cache_mem 50 MB > visible_hostname my-proliant > cache_dir ufs /var/cache/squid/ 100 16 256 > cache_peer miss-whoops.fogwatch.com.au parent 800 0 default no-query > acl QUERY urlpath_regex cgi-bin \? > no_cache deny QUERY > cache_effective_user squid > cache_effective_group squid > maximum_object_size 102400 KB > log_mime_hdrs off > forwarded_for off > acl my_network src 192.168.1.0/24 > acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 > http_access allow my_network > http_access deny all > request_body_max_size 0 KB > reply_body_max_size 0 allow all > > Any help that you are able to allocate to this problem will be much appreciated. Thank you. > > Regards > > Fog_Watch.
