On Wed, Sep 13, 2006, Tom Warren wrote: > I have recently set up a transparent squid cache at the small ISP > where I work using Fedora Core 4 and squid-2.6.STABLE3. It is > performing well but I'd like to cache additional traffic such as > alternate HTTP ports and maybe later even FTP using something like > FROX. Hm, FTP will be a bit nasty - I'm not sure how WCCP will redirect all the traffic for the dynamic data ports.. > - What is the standard syntax for redirecting multiple ports using > 'wccp2_service dynamic' and 'wccp2_service_info' configuration > parameters. Good question! I'll take a look when I get home tonight. > - Can I operate standard (web-cache) and dynamic services simultaneously? I think so. I'll re-read the spec (and the code) tonight. > - After I successfully redirect other ports like 8080, et. al. to > squid, will it automagically use the original port number in its > request? I don't think squid has the smarts to do this; but its easy to emulate. You'd just redirect multiple traffic ports in iptables (one per rule) to Squid, and have a bunch of http_port lines, eg: http_port 3128 ip.ip.ip.ip:3128 transparent vport=80 http_port 8080 ip.ip.ip.ip:8080 transparent vport=8080 http_port 8081 ip.ip.ip.ip:8080 transparent vport=8081 .. which I think -should- work, but its a good question! I'll try it out with my WCCPv2 testing setup at home and let you know. Adrian
