Search squid archive

Re: Squid 2/3 slower than direct access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just go to find problems in ur dns settings, in squid. is ur icp or
isp uses transparent cache upstream. however dns. I have 2 of dl380 ;)
. in unix base systems do not go for cpu and hdd configuration for
squid issues ...
nima

On 9/2/06, Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


--On September 2, 2006 7:53:59 PM +1000 Greg Wilson
<gwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've installed Squid on a HP DL380 server with dual cpus, 2 Gb RAM and
> SCSI raid 5. It's running on Debian Sarge with little extra load. I am

Well...it shouldn't have much to do with the speed of Squid if it's a
hardware RAID....but has the RAID 5 set finished building?  Also are there
no failed disks in the set?

> using this for our staff of around 100 and though this would do the job
> easily. It's running with all default Squid settings except Cache RAM
> which I've increased to 96Mb. There are no peer caches. I have checked
> that there are no speed and duplex setting mismatches between the proxy
> and firewall.
> The squid proxy returns web pages approx. 2/3 slower than a direct
> connection using the same link.
> Can some-one please give me some simple steps to increase the speed of
> the cache?
> Thanks for any advice.
>



--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler



--
Best Regards
NIMA SADEGHIAN

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux