fre 2006-08-11 klockan 09:42 -0800 skrev Chris Robertson: > Are you using XFF strictly for logging, or do you have ACLs? If it's > strictly for logging (and XFF on 2.6 behaves like the XFF patch for 2.5) XFF in 2.6 is the XFF patch for 2.5 so it should behave identical. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
