mån 2006-08-07 klockan 16:19 -0300 skrev "Luís Fernando C. Talora": > I didn´t want to do that, because I´d like to block every URL with > matching words on it (such as "briefcase" for example.briefcase.com, > briefcase.example.com and www.example.com/briefcase). The ACL is OK in > that case, right? What could be causing the behavior I´m experiencing here? I don't have an explanation, but I thing you may want to use the dstdomain_regex acl, not url_regex.. example why: Your pattern will also block google searches for driveway or any of the other patterns, and a number of other unexpected things where the same sequences of letters occur anywhere in the URL. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
