> >and a small informaition i need > >as you see i give weight=1 > >to all peers > >So if i want to give pref to some did i change it > >to weight=3 for to be use more > >then weight=2 next > >and weight=1 for least > >some places i saw the weight=70 or like this (did > this > >forward 70 req then go to weight=50 > > > > Weight doesn't do what you think it does. From the > old docs: > > If more than one cache server has an object (based > on the result of an > ICP query), Squid decides which cache to get the > data from the cache > that responded fastest. If you want to prefer one > cache over another, > you can add a weight value to the preferred cache's > config line. Larger > values are preferred. Squid times how long each ICP > request takes (in > milliseconds), and divides the time by the weight > value, using the cache > with the smallest result. Your weight value should > thus not be an > unreasonable value. > > If you want to favor one cache_peer parent over an > other, I think you > have to utilize carp-load-factor instead of > round-robin, which likely > will require recompiling Squid. Run "squid -v" and > look for --enable-carp. > > Chris ============================= sir after --enable-carp in configuration did i change this only cache_peer proxy.jub.com parent 8080 7 no-query round-robin weigt=1 ===TO======= cache_peer proxy.jub.com parent 8080 7 no-query carp weight=1 Is this OK or need to do some thing more __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
