tor 2006-06-29 klockan 11:27 +0200 skrev Andreas J. Koenig: > We think this is a bug. Why should 0 byte replies be less cacheable? They are not less cacheable, but there is not much use in keeping them around after expiry for conditional cache validation which is what this test is about. A zero sized object with reasonably expiry time (at least 60 seconds from now) is still cached like anything else cacheable. > We're now planning to patch our squid to remove this chunk and hope > this will solve our problems. Are we missing something? You are welcome to if this helps you, but I think your real problem is elsewhere (lack of proper expiry information in the responses or similar). Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
